You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Prognostic factor for Korean patients with renal cell carcinoma and venous tumor thrombus extension: application of the new 2009 TNM staging system
International Brazilian Journal of Urology, June 2013
Min Chul Cho, Jung Kwon Kim, Kyung Chul Moon, Hyeon Hoe Kim, Cheol Kwak
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||3||20%|
|Student > Postgraduate||2||13%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||2||13%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||6||40%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||2||13%|
|Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine||1||7%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||1||7%|
|Arts and Humanities||1||7%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2013.
All research outputs
of 22,715,151 outputs
Outputs from International Brazilian Journal of Urology
of 688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 194,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Brazilian Journal of Urology
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,715,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 688 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.