The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Algorithmic folk theories and peer review: on the importance of valuing participant expertise (commentary)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Gender Studies, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.1080/09589236.2024.2377630 |
Authors |
Carolina Are |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Georgia | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 29 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 15 | 44% |
Members of the public | 15 | 44% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,680,732
of 26,510,312 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gender Studies
#78
of 668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,528
of 240,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gender Studies
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,510,312 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.