↓ Skip to main content

‘Instructive types’ or mere ‘fancies’: assessing French fashion prints in the library of Samuel Pepys

Overview of attention for article published in Seventeenth Century, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 220)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
155 news outlets
book_reviews
1 book reviewer
blogs
1 blog
twitter
50 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
‘Instructive types’ or mere ‘fancies’: assessing French fashion prints in the library of Samuel Pepys
Published in
Seventeenth Century, July 2024
DOI 10.1080/0268117x.2024.2373990
Authors

Marlo Avidon

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1203. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2024.
All research outputs
#12,747
of 26,781,112 outputs
Outputs from Seventeenth Century
#1
of 220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207
of 300,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seventeenth Century
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,781,112 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them