The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
‘Instructive types’ or mere ‘fancies’: assessing French fashion prints in the library of Samuel Pepys
|
---|---|
Published in |
Seventeenth Century, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.1080/0268117x.2024.2373990 |
Authors |
Marlo Avidon |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 15 | 30% |
United States | 3 | 6% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Guinea-Bissau | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 29 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 30 | 60% |
Scientists | 11 | 22% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1203. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2024.
All research outputs
#12,747
of 26,781,112 outputs
Outputs from Seventeenth Century
#1
of 220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207
of 300,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seventeenth Century
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,781,112 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them