The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 380 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Proteomic signatures improve risk prediction for common and rare diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Medicine, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41591-024-03142-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julia Carrasco-Zanini, Maik Pietzner, Jonathan Davitte, Praveen Surendran, Damien C. Croteau-Chonka, Chloe Robins, Ana Torralbo, Christopher Tomlinson, Florian Grünschläger, Natalie Fitzpatrick, Cai Ytsma, Tokuwa Kanno, Stephan Gade, Daniel Freitag, Frederik Ziebell, Simon Haas, Spiros Denaxas, Joanna C. Betts, Nicholas J. Wareham, Harry Hemingway, Robert A. Scott, Claudia Langenberg |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 1% |
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 358 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 248 | 65% |
| Scientists | 110 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 26% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 19% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 13 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 19% |
| Unknown | 2 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 753. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2024.
All research outputs
#28,109
of 26,583,927 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#224
of 9,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#390
of 276,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#11
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,583,927 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 106.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.