↓ Skip to main content

Influence of Repeated Prescribed Fire on Tree Growth and Mortality in Pinus resinosa Forests, Northern Minnesota

Overview of attention for article published in Forest Science, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Influence of Repeated Prescribed Fire on Tree Growth and Mortality in Pinus resinosa Forests, Northern Minnesota
Published in
Forest Science, February 2017
DOI 10.5849/forsci.16-035
Authors

Alessandra Bottero, Anthony W. D'Amato, Brian J. Palik, Christel C. Kern, John B. Bradford, Sawyer S. Scherer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Researcher 7 19%
Other 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 15 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 24%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,981,504
of 13,949,300 outputs
Outputs from Forest Science
#63
of 119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,548
of 258,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forest Science
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,949,300 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.