↓ Skip to main content

Cost-effectiveness of natural forest regeneration and plantations for climate mitigation

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Climate Change, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
34 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
72 X users
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost-effectiveness of natural forest regeneration and plantations for climate mitigation
Published in
Nature Climate Change, July 2024
DOI 10.1038/s41558-024-02068-1
Authors

Jonah Busch, Jacob J. Bukoski, Susan C. Cook-Patton, Bronson Griscom, David Kaczan, Matthew D. Potts, Yuanyuan Yi, Jeffrey R. Vincent

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 26%
Researcher 7 18%
Other 2 5%
Lecturer 1 3%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 14 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 14 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Unspecified 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Unknown 18 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 319. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2024.
All research outputs
#114,710
of 26,748,235 outputs
Outputs from Nature Climate Change
#422
of 4,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,437
of 298,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Climate Change
#11
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,748,235 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 131.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.