The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 147 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Supervised, structured and individualized exercise in metastatic breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Medicine, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41591-024-03143-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anouk E. Hiensch, Johanna Depenbusch, Martina E. Schmidt, Evelyn M. Monninkhof, Mireia Pelaez, Dorothea Clauss, Nadira Gunasekara, Philipp Zimmer, Jon Belloso, Mark Trevaskis, Helene Rundqvist, Joachim Wiskemann, Jana Müller, Maike G. Sweegers, Carlo Fremd, Renske Altena, Maciej Gorecki, Rhodé Bijlsma, Lobke van Leeuwen-Snoeks, Daan ten Bokkel Huinink, Gabe Sonke, Ainhara Lahuerta, G. Bruce Mann, Prudence A. Francis, Gary Richardson, Wolfram Malter, Elsken van der Wall, Neil K. Aaronson, Elzbieta Senkus, Ander Urruticoechea, Eva M. Zopf, Wilhelm Bloch, Martijn M. Stuiver, Yvonne Wengstrom, Karen Steindorf, Anne M. May |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 4 | 3% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 131 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 95 | 65% |
| Scientists | 27 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 22 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 31% |
| Researcher | 5 | 31% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 25% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 44% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 215. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2024.
All research outputs
#192,733
of 26,596,651 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#830
of 9,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,126
of 276,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#30
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,596,651 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 109.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.