The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 395 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Evolution of the Journal Club: From Osler to Twitter
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Kidney Diseases, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.12.012 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joel M. Topf, Matthew A. Sparks, Paul J. Phelan, Nikhil Shah, Edgar V. Lerma, Matthew P.M. Graham-Brown, Hector Madariaga, Francesco Iannuzzella, Michelle N. Rheault, Thomas Oates, Kenar D. Jhaveri, Swapnil Hiremath |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 77 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 17 | 4% |
| Canada | 14 | 4% |
| Mexico | 5 | 1% |
| Ireland | 4 | 1% |
| India | 4 | 1% |
| Sweden | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 21 | 5% |
| Unknown | 244 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 195 | 49% |
| Scientists | 91 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 80 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 28 | 7% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 164 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 13% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 48 | 29% |
| Unknown | 36 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 16% |
| Unknown | 35 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 263. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2024.
All research outputs
#146,071
of 26,365,186 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Kidney Diseases
#42
of 5,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,156
of 327,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Kidney Diseases
#3
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,365,186 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.