The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 171 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Unveiling the epigenetic impact of vegan vs. omnivorous diets on aging: insights from the Twins Nutrition Study (TwiNS)
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12916-024-03513-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Varun B. Dwaraka, Lucia Aronica, Natalia Carreras-Gallo, Jennifer L. Robinson, Tayler Hennings, Matthew M. Carter, Michael J. Corley, Aaron Lin, Logan Turner, Ryan Smith, Tavis L. Mendez, Hannah Went, Emily R. Ebel, Erica D. Sonnenburg, Justin L. Sonnenburg, Christopher D. Gardner |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 27 | 16% |
United Kingdom | 9 | 5% |
Finland | 9 | 5% |
Australia | 5 | 3% |
Spain | 5 | 3% |
Germany | 5 | 3% |
Canada | 2 | 1% |
India | 2 | 1% |
Uruguay | 2 | 1% |
Other | 20 | 12% |
Unknown | 85 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 133 | 78% |
Scientists | 24 | 14% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 5% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 7 | 20% |
Researcher | 5 | 14% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 9 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 8 | 23% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 9% |
Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 23% |
Unknown | 8 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2911. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2024.
All research outputs
#2,440
of 26,793,597 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#5
of 4,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21
of 297,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#1
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,793,597 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,340 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.