You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Five Cases of Transanal Rectal Foreign Body Extraction Based on an Analysis of 140 Japanese Literature Reports
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nihon Gekakei Rengo Gakkaishi (Journal of Japanese College of Surgeons), January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.4030/jjcs.35.199 |
| Authors |
Keiichi Takagaki, Kuniyasu Murahashi, Keeko Kishimoto, Aya Mino, Koichi Nishino, Toyoaki Aoki, Michio Sowa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 113 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 33 | 29% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Solomon Islands | 1 | <1% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Nepal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 66% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 113 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2023.
All research outputs
#427,843
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Gekakei Rengo Gakkaishi (Journal of Japanese College of Surgeons)
#1
of 30 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,413
of 174,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Gekakei Rengo Gakkaishi (Journal of Japanese College of Surgeons)
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one scored the same or higher as 29 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them