↓ Skip to main content

Implementation of the Business Process Modelling Notation (BPMN) in the modelling of anatomic pathology processes

Overview of attention for article published in Diagnostic Pathology, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implementation of the Business Process Modelling Notation (BPMN) in the modelling of anatomic pathology processes
Published in
Diagnostic Pathology, July 2008
DOI 10.1186/1746-1596-3-s1-s22
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcial García Rojo, Elvira Rolón, Luis Calahorra, Felix Óscar García, Rosario Paloma Sánchez, Francisco Ruiz, Nieves Ballester, María Armenteros, Teresa Rodríguez, Rafael Martín Espartero

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 2%
United States 2 2%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 114 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 18%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Professor 9 7%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 18 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 55 44%
Business, Management and Accounting 14 11%
Engineering 12 10%
Social Sciences 10 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 20 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2017.
All research outputs
#15,979,491
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#456
of 1,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,871
of 95,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,193 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.