You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Implementation of the Business Process Modelling Notation (BPMN) in the modelling of anatomic pathology processes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Diagnostic Pathology, July 2008
|
DOI | 10.1186/1746-1596-3-s1-s22 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marcial García Rojo, Elvira Rolón, Luis Calahorra, Felix Óscar García, Rosario Paloma Sánchez, Francisco Ruiz, Nieves Ballester, María Armenteros, Teresa Rodríguez, Rafael Martín Espartero |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 3 | 2% |
United States | 2 | 2% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 114 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 34 | 27% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 18% |
Researcher | 11 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
Professor | 9 | 7% |
Other | 22 | 18% |
Unknown | 18 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 55 | 44% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 14 | 11% |
Engineering | 12 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 6% |
Unknown | 20 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2017.
All research outputs
#15,979,491
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#456
of 1,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,871
of 95,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,193 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.