↓ Skip to main content

Cranioencephalic functional lymphoid units in glioblastoma

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Medicine, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
202 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
2 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cranioencephalic functional lymphoid units in glioblastoma
Published in
Nature Medicine, July 2024
DOI 10.1038/s41591-024-03152-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Celia Dobersalske, Laurèl Rauschenbach, Yichao Hua, Christoph Berliner, Anita Steinbach, Anika Grüneboom, Konstantinos D. Kokkaliaris, Dieter H. Heiland, Pia Berger, Sarah Langer, Chin L. Tan, Martin Stenzel, Somaya Landolsi, Flora Weber, Marvin Darkwah Oppong, Rudolf A. Werner, Hanah Gull, Thomas Schröder, Thomas Linsenmann, Andreas K. Buck, Matthias Gunzer, Martin Stuschke, Kathy Keyvani, Michael Forsting, Martin Glas, Jonathan Kipnis, Dennis A. Steindler, Hans Christian Reinhardt, Edward W. Green, Michael Platten, Alpaslan Tasdogan, Ken Herrmann, Florian Rambow, Igor Cima, Ulrich Sure, Björn Scheffler

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 202 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 38%
Researcher 2 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 38%
Neuroscience 1 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 199. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2024.
All research outputs
#213,657
of 26,613,602 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#906
of 9,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,318
of 274,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#30
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,613,602 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 109.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.