↓ Skip to main content

Acupuncture and assisted reproductive technology.

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
26 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acupuncture and assisted reproductive technology.
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006920.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheong YC, Dix S, Hung Yu Ng E, Ledger WL, Farquhar C, Cheong, Ying C, Dix, Sarah, Hung Yu Ng, Ernest, Ledger, William L, Farquhar, Cindy

Abstract

Acupuncture is commonly undertaken during an assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycle although its role in improving live birth and pregnancy rates is unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 25%
Researcher 4 25%
Student > Master 3 19%
Other 2 13%
Professor 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 63%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Other 2 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2017.
All research outputs
#272,299
of 8,549,553 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,045
of 8,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,828
of 128,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,549,553 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.