Acupuncture and assisted reproductive technology.

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
22 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acupuncture and assisted reproductive technology.
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006920.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheong YC, Dix S, Hung Yu Ng E, Ledger WL, Farquhar C, Cheong, Ying C, Dix, Sarah, Hung Yu Ng, Ernest, Ledger, William L, Farquhar, Cindy

Abstract

Acupuncture is commonly undertaken during an assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycle although its role in improving live birth and pregnancy rates is unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 13%
Unknown 7 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 25%
Student > Bachelor 2 25%
Researcher 2 25%
Librarian 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 50%
Computer Science 2 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Social Sciences 1 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2017.
All research outputs
#218,197
of 7,419,298 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#902
of 8,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,682
of 124,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,419,298 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.