The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Trends in colorectal cancer screening from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS): analysis of the impact of different modalities on overall screening rates
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cancer Prevention Research, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-23-0443 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Derek W. Ebner, Lila J. Finney Rutten, Lesley-Ann Miller-Wilson, Niels Markwat, Vahab Vahdat, A. Burak Ozbay, Paul J. Limburg |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 2 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2024.
All research outputs
#3,601,020
of 26,396,170 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Prevention Research
#336
of 1,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,102
of 349,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Prevention Research
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,396,170 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.