The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A prospective cohort study on stereotactic radiotherapy in the management of dural recurrence of olfactory neuroblastoma
|
---|---|
Published in |
Head & Neck, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.1002/hed.27887 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christopher D. Goodman, Franco DeMonte, Theresa P. Nguyen, Adam S. Garden, Catherine He Wang, Xin A. Wang, Kevin Diao, Anna Lee, Jay Reddy, Amy Moreno, Michael Spiotto, Clifton D. Fuller, David Rosenthal, Renata Ferrarotto, Shaan M. Raza, Shirley Y. Su, Andrew Warner, Ehab Hanna, Jack Phan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2024.
All research outputs
#14,927,816
of 26,415,653 outputs
Outputs from Head & Neck
#1,165
of 4,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,086
of 152,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Head & Neck
#1
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,415,653 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,193 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.