The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Correction by distraction: how high-tempo music enhances medical experts’ debunking TikTok videos
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.1093/jcmc/zmae007 |
Authors |
Mengyu Li, Gaofei Li, Sijia Yang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 33% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 8 | 67% |
Members of the public | 3 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 50% |
Researcher | 2 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 50% |
Psychology | 1 | 25% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2024.
All research outputs
#4,560,631
of 26,749,913 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
#292
of 722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,323
of 289,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,749,913 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 722 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.