The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Are grand tree planting initiatives meeting expectations in mitigating urban overheating during heat waves?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Sustainable Cities and Society, October 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105671 |
Authors |
Kai Gao, Jie Feng, Mattheos Santamouris |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 42% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 25% |
Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 3 | 25% |
Design | 2 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2024.
All research outputs
#1,013,037
of 26,467,269 outputs
Outputs from Sustainable Cities and Society
#64
of 1,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182
of 9,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sustainable Cities and Society
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,467,269 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.