↓ Skip to main content

Interventions to improve water quality and supply, sanitation and hygiene practices, and their effects on the nutritional status of children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
51 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
177 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
624 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions to improve water quality and supply, sanitation and hygiene practices, and their effects on the nutritional status of children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009382.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan D Dangour, Louise Watson, Oliver Cumming, Sophie Boisson, Yan Che, Yael Velleman, Sue Cavill, Elizabeth Allen, Ricardo Uauy

Abstract

Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) interventions are frequently implemented to reduce infectious diseases, and may be linked to improved nutrition outcomes in children.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 624 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 607 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 160 26%
Researcher 118 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 89 14%
Student > Bachelor 47 8%
Student > Postgraduate 34 5%
Other 129 21%
Unknown 47 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 163 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 83 13%
Social Sciences 79 13%
Environmental Science 53 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 6%
Other 123 20%
Unknown 83 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 109. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2019.
All research outputs
#153,925
of 14,056,067 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#331
of 10,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,733
of 156,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,056,067 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.