You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interventions to improve water quality and supply, sanitation and hygiene practices, and their effects on the nutritional status of children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009382.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alan D Dangour, Louise Watson, Oliver Cumming, Sophie Boisson, Yan Che, Yael Velleman, Sue Cavill, Elizabeth Allen, Ricardo Uauy |
| Abstract |
Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) interventions are frequently implemented to reduce infectious diseases, and may be linked to improved nutrition outcomes in children. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 17% |
| India | 3 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 3% |
| Niger | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 69% |
| Scientists | 5 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,026 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1010 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 210 | 20% |
| Researcher | 150 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 115 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 80 | 8% |
| Other | 46 | 4% |
| Other | 176 | 17% |
| Unknown | 249 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 205 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 121 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 106 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 68 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 60 | 6% |
| Other | 168 | 16% |
| Unknown | 298 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 102. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2023.
All research outputs
#416,171
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#731
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,925
of 210,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.