The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Endothelial Cells Increase Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation in Scaffold-Free 3D Vascular Tissue
|
---|---|
Published in |
Tissue Engineering: Part A, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.1089/ten.tea.2024.0122 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
William G. DeMaria, Andre E. Figueroa-Milla, Abigail Kaija, Anne E. Harrington, Benjamin Tero, Larisa Ryzhova, Lucy Liaw, Marsha W. Rolle |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2024.
All research outputs
#4,879,970
of 26,460,266 outputs
Outputs from Tissue Engineering: Part A
#249
of 1,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,410
of 272,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tissue Engineering: Part A
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,460,266 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,885 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.