↓ Skip to main content

Cross-ecosystem impacts of stream pollution reduce resource and contaminant flux to riparian food webs

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Applications, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cross-ecosystem impacts of stream pollution reduce resource and contaminant flux to riparian food webs
Published in
Ecological Applications, March 2014
DOI 10.1890/13-0252.1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johanna M. Kraus, Travis S. Schmidt, David M. Walters, Richard B. Wanty, Robert E. Zuellig, Ruth E. Wolf

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Mexico 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 106 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 22%
Researcher 23 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 19%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 6 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 46 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 37%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Engineering 2 2%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 17 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2020.
All research outputs
#4,844,236
of 18,812,015 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#1,231
of 3,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,475
of 170,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#12
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,812,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,002 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.