↓ Skip to main content

Cross-ecosystem impacts of stream pollution reduce resource and contaminant flux to riparian food webs

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Applications, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cross-ecosystem impacts of stream pollution reduce resource and contaminant flux to riparian food webs
Published in
Ecological Applications, March 2014
DOI 10.1890/13-0252.1
Authors

Johanna M. Kraus, Travis S. Schmidt, David M. Walters, Richard B. Wanty, Robert E. Zuellig, Ruth E. Wolf

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
South Africa 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 83 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 22%
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 18 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 38 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 41%
Unspecified 8 9%
Engineering 3 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Other 2 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2014.
All research outputs
#7,012,386
of 12,960,324 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#1,519
of 2,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,898
of 153,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#15
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,960,324 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.