↓ Skip to main content

Coordination of care for individuals with advanced progressive conditions: a multi-site ethnographic and serial interview study

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Coordination of care for individuals with advanced progressive conditions: a multi-site ethnographic and serial interview study
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, August 2013
DOI 10.3399/bjgp13x670714
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruce Mason, Eleni Epiphaniou, Veronica Nanton, Anne Donaldson, Cathy Shipman, Barbara A Daveson, Richard Harding, Irene Higginson, Dan Munday, Stephen Barclay, Kirsty Boyd, Jeremy Dale, Marilyn Kendall, Allison Worth, Scott A Murray

Abstract

Coordination of care for individuals with advanced progressive conditions is frequently poor.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 116 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 17%
Student > Master 18 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 14 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 23%
Social Sciences 17 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 16 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2019.
All research outputs
#3,301,086
of 17,358,590 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,308
of 3,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,768
of 166,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#18
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,358,590 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.