↓ Skip to main content

Coordination of care for individuals with advanced progressive conditions: a multi-site ethnographic and serial interview study

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Coordination of care for individuals with advanced progressive conditions: a multi-site ethnographic and serial interview study
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, August 2013
DOI 10.3399/bjgp13x670714
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruce Mason, Eleni Epiphaniou, Veronica Nanton, Anne Donaldson, Cathy Shipman, Barbara A Daveson, Richard Harding, Irene Higginson, Dan Munday, Stephen Barclay, Kirsty Boyd, Jeremy Dale, Marilyn Kendall, Allison Worth, Scott A Murray, Mason B, Epiphaniou E, Nanton V, Donaldson A, Shipman C, Daveson BA, Harding R, Higginson I, Munday D, Barclay S, Boyd K, Dale J, Kendall M, Worth A, Murray SA

Abstract

Coordination of care for individuals with advanced progressive conditions is frequently poor.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 4%
Canada 2 3%
Unknown 73 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 7 9%
Other 22 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 23%
Social Sciences 11 14%
Unspecified 6 8%
Psychology 4 5%
Other 7 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2016.
All research outputs
#1,755,014
of 7,921,887 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#723
of 1,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,312
of 126,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#18
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,921,887 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.