↓ Skip to main content

Coordination of care for individuals with advanced progressive conditions: a multi-site ethnographic and serial interview study

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Coordination of care for individuals with advanced progressive conditions: a multi-site ethnographic and serial interview study
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, August 2013
DOI 10.3399/bjgp13x670714
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruce Mason, Eleni Epiphaniou, Veronica Nanton, Anne Donaldson, Cathy Shipman, Barbara A Daveson, Richard Harding, Irene Higginson, Dan Munday, Stephen Barclay, Kirsty Boyd, Jeremy Dale, Marilyn Kendall, Allison Worth, Scott A Murray

Abstract

Coordination of care for individuals with advanced progressive conditions is frequently poor.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 85 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 23 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 22%
Social Sciences 15 17%
Unspecified 8 9%
Psychology 4 5%
Other 6 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2016.
All research outputs
#3,571,039
of 12,980,442 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,272
of 2,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,809
of 153,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#20
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,980,442 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.