↓ Skip to main content

Quantifying the Influence of Climate on Human Conflict

Overview of attention for article published in Science, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 42,583)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
788 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Quantifying the Influence of Climate on Human Conflict
Published in
Science, January 2013
DOI 10.1126/science.1235367
Pubmed ID
Authors

Solomon M. Hsiang, Marshall Burke, Edward Miguel, Hsiang SM, Burke M, Miguel E, S. M. Hsiang, M. Burke, E. Miguel

Abstract

A rapidly growing body of research examines whether human conflict can be affected by climatic changes. Drawing from archaeology, criminology, economics, geography, history, political science, and psychology, we assemble and analyze the 60 most rigorous quantitative studies and document, for the first time, a striking convergence of results. We find strong causal evidence linking climatic events to human conflict across a range of spatial and temporal scales and across all major regions of the world. The magnitude of climate's influence is substantial: for each one standard deviation (1σ) change in climate toward warmer temperatures or more extreme rainfall, median estimates indicate that the frequency of interpersonal violence rises 4% and the frequency of intergroup conflict rises 14%. Because locations throughout the inhabited world are expected to warm 2σ to 4σ by 2050, amplified rates of human conflict could represent a large and critical impact of anthropogenic climate change.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 790 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 788 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 46 6%
Germany 13 2%
United Kingdom 8 1%
France 6 <1%
Switzerland 4 <1%
Finland 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Other 24 3%
Unknown 675 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 267 34%
Researcher 167 21%
Student > Master 100 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 49 6%
Student > Bachelor 48 6%
Other 157 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 160 20%
Social Sciences 136 17%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 114 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 86 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 85 11%
Other 207 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1863. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2017.
All research outputs
#425
of 8,659,198 outputs
Outputs from Science
#24
of 42,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7
of 128,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#2
of 739 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,659,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 739 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.