↓ Skip to main content

Quantifying the Influence of Climate on Human Conflict

Overview of attention for article published in Science, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 45,191)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Quantifying the Influence of Climate on Human Conflict
Published in
Science, January 2013
DOI 10.1126/science.1235367
Pubmed ID
Authors

Solomon M. Hsiang, Marshall Burke, Edward Miguel, Hsiang SM, Burke M, Miguel E, S. M. Hsiang, M. Burke, E. Miguel

Abstract

A rapidly growing body of research examines whether human conflict can be affected by climatic changes. Drawing from archaeology, criminology, economics, geography, history, political science, and psychology, we assemble and analyze the 60 most rigorous quantitative studies and document, for the first time, a striking convergence of results. We find strong causal evidence linking climatic events to human conflict across a range of spatial and temporal scales and across all major regions of the world. The magnitude of climate's influence is substantial: for each one standard deviation (1σ) change in climate toward warmer temperatures or more extreme rainfall, median estimates indicate that the frequency of interpersonal violence rises 4% and the frequency of intergroup conflict rises 14%. Because locations throughout the inhabited world are expected to warm 2σ to 4σ by 2050, amplified rates of human conflict could represent a large and critical impact of anthropogenic climate change.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 798 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
United Kingdom 5 2%
Germany 3 1%
Finland 2 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Czech Republic 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 180 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 32%
Researcher 44 22%
Student > Master 20 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 7%
Other 45 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 51 25%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 39 19%
Social Sciences 27 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 19 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 8%
Other 51 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1864. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2018.
All research outputs
#525
of 9,725,803 outputs
Outputs from Science
#34
of 45,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7
of 133,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#2
of 739 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,725,803 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 45,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 739 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.