The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Human-Comparable Sensitivity of Large Language Models in Identifying Eligible Studies Through Title and Abstract Screening: 3-Layer Strategy Using GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 for Systematic Reviews
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Medical Internet Research, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.2196/52758 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kentaro Matsui, Tomohiro Utsumi, Yumi Aoki, Taku Maruki, Masahiro Takeshima, Yoshikazu Takaesu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 11 | 31% |
Solomon Islands | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 23 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 27 | 75% |
Scientists | 5 | 14% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 2 | 50% |
Unspecified | 2 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 50% |
Engineering | 2 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2024.
All research outputs
#1,845,083
of 26,680,103 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#1,460
of 8,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,345
of 259,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#10
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,680,103 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.