The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Voices of experience: insights from Dutch parents on periviability guidelines and personalisation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.1136/archdischild-2024-327398 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lien De Proost, Angret de Boer, Eduard Verhagen, Marije Hogeveen, Rosa Geurtzen, E J T Joanne Verweij |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Australia | 1 | 14% |
Spain | 1 | 14% |
Ireland | 1 | 14% |
France | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2024.
All research outputs
#3,352,855
of 26,680,103 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#499
of 2,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,835
of 260,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#4
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,680,103 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.