The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 80 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
WebAtlas pipeline for integrated single-cell and spatial transcriptomic data
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Methods, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41592-024-02371-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tong Li, David Horsfall, Daniela Basurto-Lozada, Kenny Roberts, Martin Prete, John E. G. Lawrence, Peng He, Elisabeth Tuck, Josh Moore, Aybuke Kupcu Yoldas, Kolawole Babalola, Matthew Hartley, Shila Ghazanfar, Sarah A. Teichmann, Muzlifah Haniffa, Omer Ali Bayraktar |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 22 | 28% |
Germany | 6 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 5% |
Australia | 3 | 4% |
Canada | 2 | 3% |
Hong Kong | 2 | 3% |
Sweden | 2 | 3% |
Czechia | 2 | 3% |
France | 2 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 14% |
Unknown | 24 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 39 | 49% |
Members of the public | 39 | 49% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 22% |
Researcher | 4 | 15% |
Professor | 3 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 11% |
Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 15% |
Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 30% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 15% |
Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
Computer Science | 2 | 7% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Unknown | 7 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2024.
All research outputs
#1,136,440
of 26,238,951 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#1,473
of 5,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,841
of 223,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#22
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,238,951 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.