The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Protecting controversial thought: Editing Bioethics in the age of social media facilitated outrage
|
---|---|
Published in |
Bioethics, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.1111/bioe.13343 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Udo Schuklenk |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 42% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 16% |
Ireland | 1 | 5% |
Canada | 1 | 5% |
Australia | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 42% |
Scientists | 5 | 26% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 16% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2024.
All research outputs
#1,893,929
of 26,740,027 outputs
Outputs from Bioethics
#136
of 1,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,430
of 271,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioethics
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,740,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them