↓ Skip to main content

Nebulised hypertonic saline solution for acute bronchiolitis in infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
103 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nebulised hypertonic saline solution for acute bronchiolitis in infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006458.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linjie Zhang, Raúl A Mendoza-Sassi, Claire Wainwright, Terry P Klassen

Abstract

Airway oedema and mucus plugging are the predominant pathological features in infants with acute viral bronchiolitis. Nebulised hypertonic saline solution may reduce these pathological changes and decrease airway obstruction.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 103 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 148 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 18%
Other 20 13%
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 19 12%
Other 39 25%
Unknown 12 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 119 75%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Psychology 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 16 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2018.
All research outputs
#231,053
of 15,927,389 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#488
of 11,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,268
of 160,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,927,389 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.