↓ Skip to main content

Nebulised hypertonic saline solution for acute bronchiolitis in infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
107 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nebulised hypertonic saline solution for acute bronchiolitis in infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006458.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linjie Zhang, Raúl A Mendoza-Sassi, Claire Wainwright, Terry P Klassen

Abstract

Airway oedema and mucus plugging are the predominant pathological features in infants with acute viral bronchiolitis. Nebulised hypertonic saline solution may reduce these pathological changes and decrease airway obstruction.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 107 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 400%
United States 3 300%
Indonesia 1 100%
Portugal 1 100%
Switzerland 1 100%
Italy 1 100%
Denmark 1 100%
Spain 1 100%
Colombia 1 100%
Other 0 0%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 4900%
Student > Bachelor 47 4700%
Researcher 45 4500%
Other 42 4200%
Student > Postgraduate 31 3100%
Other 118 11800%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 232 23200%
Unspecified 31 3100%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 2100%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 1400%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 900%
Other 25 2500%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 98. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2018.
All research outputs
#165,998
of 13,605,430 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#374
of 10,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,957
of 155,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,605,430 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.