The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Using AI to Identify Unremarkable Chest Radiographs for Automatic Reporting.
|
---|---|
Published in |
Radiology, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.1148/radiol.240272 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Louis Lind Plesner, Felix C Müller, Mathias W Brejnebøl, Christian Hedeager Krag, Lene C Laustrup, Finn Rasmussen, Olav Wendelboe Nielsen, Mikael Boesen, Michael B Andersen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 50% |
Spain | 2 | 25% |
Italy | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 38% |
Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 149. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2024.
All research outputs
#298,450
of 26,639,477 outputs
Outputs from Radiology
#288
of 10,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,588
of 288,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiology
#5
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,639,477 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,490 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.