↓ Skip to main content

Retraction notice to ”A comparative thermodynamic and exergoeconomic scrutiny of four geothermal systems with various configurations of TEG and HDH unit implementations” [Appl. Therm. Eng. 216 (2022…

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Thermal Engineering, October 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Retraction notice to ”A comparative thermodynamic and exergoeconomic scrutiny of four geothermal systems with various configurations of TEG and HDH unit implementations” [Appl. Therm. Eng. 216 (2022) 119094]
Published in
Applied Thermal Engineering, October 2024
DOI 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.124170
Authors

Zhe Liu, Zhanguo Su, Azher M. Abed, Risabh Chaturvedi, Mahrad Feyzbaxsh, Ali Kiani Salavat

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2024.
All research outputs
#6,976,646
of 26,538,769 outputs
Outputs from Applied Thermal Engineering
#272
of 1,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,394
of 28,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Thermal Engineering
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,538,769 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them