↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for preventing and treating pelvic and back pain in pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
36 tweeters
facebook
10 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
424 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for preventing and treating pelvic and back pain in pregnancy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001139.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pennick V, Liddle SD, Pennick, Victoria, Liddle, Sarah D

Abstract

More than two-thirds of pregnant women experience low-back pain (LBP) and almost one-fifth experience pelvic pain. Pain increases with advancing pregnancy and interferes with work, daily activities and sleep.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 424 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Malta 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 409 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 94 22%
Student > Bachelor 75 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 8%
Student > Postgraduate 34 8%
Researcher 34 8%
Other 106 25%
Unknown 46 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 188 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 85 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 5%
Sports and Recreations 19 4%
Psychology 13 3%
Other 38 9%
Unknown 61 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2015.
All research outputs
#629,263
of 15,908,843 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,679
of 11,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,085
of 160,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,908,843 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.