↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for preventing and treating pelvic and back pain in pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
36 tweeters
facebook
10 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
347 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for preventing and treating pelvic and back pain in pregnancy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001139.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pennick V, Liddle SD, Pennick, Victoria, Liddle, Sarah D

Abstract

More than two-thirds of pregnant women experience low-back pain (LBP) and almost one-fifth experience pelvic pain. Pain increases with advancing pregnancy and interferes with work, daily activities and sleep.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 347 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Malta 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 332 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 75 22%
Student > Bachelor 68 20%
Student > Postgraduate 32 9%
Researcher 31 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 8%
Other 83 24%
Unknown 31 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 169 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 65 19%
Sports and Recreations 16 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 4%
Psychology 13 4%
Other 23 7%
Unknown 46 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2015.
All research outputs
#442,379
of 12,996,289 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,403
of 10,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,234
of 153,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,996,289 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.