↓ Skip to main content

Are conservation biologists working too hard?

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 2,914)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
215 tweeters
facebook
32 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
305 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Are conservation biologists working too hard?
Published in
Biological Conservation, October 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.06.029
Authors

Ahimsa Campos-Arceiz, Lian Pin Koh, Richard B. Primack

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 215 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 305 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 20 7%
United Kingdom 6 2%
Spain 5 2%
United States 5 2%
Mexico 4 1%
Portugal 4 1%
Chile 3 <1%
South Africa 3 <1%
Argentina 3 <1%
Other 18 6%
Unknown 234 77%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 76 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 22%
Student > Master 41 13%
Student > Bachelor 26 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 7%
Other 74 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 191 63%
Environmental Science 70 23%
Unspecified 14 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 3%
Social Sciences 7 2%
Other 15 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 220. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2017.
All research outputs
#31,304
of 8,386,447 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#12
of 2,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#474
of 128,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#1
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,386,447 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.