↓ Skip to main content

Overview of attention for article published in Wildlife Research, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
Wildlife Research, January 2013
DOI 10.1071/wr13069
Authors

Blake M. Allan, John P. Y. Arnould, Jennifer K. Martin, Euan G. Ritchie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Latvia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 104 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 33%
Student > Master 20 18%
Researcher 17 15%
Other 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 22 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 54%
Environmental Science 35 31%
Unspecified 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Other 4 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2014.
All research outputs
#768,770
of 8,280,585 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Research
#64
of 535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,880
of 128,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Research
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,280,585 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 535 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them