The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Stable Platform for Mevalonate Bioproduction from CO2
|
---|---|
Published in |
Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c03561 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marco Garavaglia, Callum McGregor, Rajesh Reddy Bommareddy, Victor Irorere, Christian Arenas, Alberto Robazza, Nigel Peter Minton, Katalin Kovacs |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2024.
All research outputs
#909,640
of 26,251,549 outputs
Outputs from Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
#134
of 5,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,485
of 193,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
#2
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,251,549 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.