↓ Skip to main content

Neuritogenic effect of standardized extract of Centella asiatica ECa233 on human neuroblastoma cells

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuritogenic effect of standardized extract of Centella asiatica ECa233 on human neuroblastoma cells
Published in
BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-13-204
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oraphan Wanakhachornkrai, Varisa Pongrakhananon, Preedakorn Chunhacha, Aree Wanasuntronwong, Anusara Vattanajun, Boonyong Tantisira, Pithi Chanvorachote, Mayuree H Tantisira

Abstract

In order to gain insight into neuroprotective effects of ECa 233, a standardized extract of Centella asiatica, previously demonstrated in animal models of memory impairment induced by transient global ischemia or intracerebroventricular injection of beta-amyloid, the effect of ECa 233 on neurite outgrowth of human IMR-32 neuroblastoma cell line was investigated.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
India 1 2%
Unknown 62 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 20%
Student > Master 12 19%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 3 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 23%
Neuroscience 10 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 5 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2013.
All research outputs
#4,094,284
of 7,820,613 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
#1,097
of 1,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,044
of 126,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
#42
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,820,613 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,944 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.