↓ Skip to main content

Interventions (other than pharmacological, psychosocial or psychological) for treating antenatal depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
277 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions (other than pharmacological, psychosocial or psychological) for treating antenatal depression
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006795.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cindy-Lee Dennis, Therese Dowswell

Abstract

A meta-analysis of 21 studies suggests the mean prevalence rate for depression across the antenatal period is 10.7%, ranging from 7.4% in the first trimester to a high of 12.8% in the second trimester. Due to maternal treatment preferences and potential concerns about fetal and infant health outcomes, diverse non-pharmacological treatment options are needed.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 272 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 66 24%
Researcher 45 16%
Student > Bachelor 29 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 10%
Student > Postgraduate 18 6%
Other 43 16%
Unknown 48 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 29%
Psychology 49 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 14%
Social Sciences 16 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 28 10%
Unknown 59 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2019.
All research outputs
#728,451
of 14,570,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,160
of 11,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,927
of 157,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,570,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.