↓ Skip to main content

Network neuroscience

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Neuroscience, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
428 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1560 Mendeley
citeulike
8 CiteULike
Title
Network neuroscience
Published in
Nature Neuroscience, February 2017
DOI 10.1038/nn.4502
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danielle S Bassett, Olaf Sporns

Abstract

Despite substantial recent progress, our understanding of the principles and mechanisms underlying complex brain function and cognition remains incomplete. Network neuroscience proposes to tackle these enduring challenges. Approaching brain structure and function from an explicitly integrative perspective, network neuroscience pursues new ways to map, record, analyze and model the elements and interactions of neurobiological systems. Two parallel trends drive the approach: the availability of new empirical tools to create comprehensive maps and record dynamic patterns among molecules, neurons, brain areas and social systems; and the theoretical framework and computational tools of modern network science. The convergence of empirical and computational advances opens new frontiers of scientific inquiry, including network dynamics, manipulation and control of brain networks, and integration of network processes across spatiotemporal domains. We review emerging trends in network neuroscience and attempt to chart a path toward a better understanding of the brain as a multiscale networked system.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 213 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,560 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Sweden 4 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 2 <1%
Other 13 <1%
Unknown 1515 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 442 28%
Researcher 287 18%
Student > Master 208 13%
Student > Bachelor 129 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 83 5%
Other 241 15%
Unknown 170 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 446 29%
Psychology 181 12%
Engineering 137 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 136 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 98 6%
Other 279 18%
Unknown 283 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 138. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2019.
All research outputs
#124,589
of 14,556,407 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#308
of 4,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,016
of 259,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#12
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,556,407 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,449 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.