The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
iCount: a human-factors engineered solution to vaginal swab retention – an early-stage innovation report
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMJ Innovations, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.1136/bmjinnov-2024-001248 |
Authors |
Ahmed Nader Elgharably, Kiran Desai, Alan Michael Nevill, Aaron Vance, Jon Lester, Emma Bonfiglio, Colin Rigby, Andrew Forrester, Peter Ogrodnik, Jeffrey Faint, Tom Clutton-Brock, Aditi Desai |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2024.
All research outputs
#21,632,239
of 26,557,556 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Innovations
#259
of 271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,571
of 136,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Innovations
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,557,556 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.