The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 119 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The effect of exposure to radiofrequency fields on cancer risk in the general and working population: A systematic review of human observational studies – Part I: Most researched outcomes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environment International, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108983 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ken Karipidis, Dan Baaken, Tom Loney, Maria Blettner, Chris Brzozek, Mark Elwood, Clement Narh, Nicola Orsini, Martin Röösli, Marilia Silva Paulo, Susanna Lagorio |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 7% |
Mexico | 8 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 7 | 6% |
France | 7 | 6% |
Japan | 3 | 3% |
Australia | 3 | 3% |
Saudi Arabia | 3 | 3% |
Finland | 2 | 2% |
Italy | 2 | 2% |
Other | 13 | 11% |
Unknown | 63 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 102 | 86% |
Scientists | 11 | 9% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 4% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 3 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
Other | 2 | 15% |
Researcher | 1 | 8% |
Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 31% |
Unspecified | 3 | 23% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1665. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2024.
All research outputs
#6,981
of 26,736,789 outputs
Outputs from Environment International
#10
of 5,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73
of 245,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environment International
#1
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,736,789 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.