You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Feasibility of neuromuscular training in patients with severe hip or knee OA: The individualized goal-based NEMEX-TJR training program
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-11-126 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eva Ageberg, Anne Link, Ewa M Roos |
| Abstract |
Although improvements are achieved by general exercise, training to improve sensorimotor control may be needed for people with osteoarthritis (OA). The aim was to apply the principles of neuromuscular training, which have been successfully used in younger and middle-aged patients with knee injuries, to older patients with severe hip or knee OA. We hypothesized that the training program was feasible, determined as: 1) at most acceptable self-reported pain following training; 2) decreased or unchanged pain during the training period; 3) few joint specific adverse events related to training, and 4) achieved progression of training level during the training period. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 22% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Chile | 1 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| Germany | 1 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 4 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 307 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 298 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 56 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 49 | 16% |
| Researcher | 27 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 60 | 20% |
| Unknown | 69 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 63 | 21% |
| Sports and Recreations | 45 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Engineering | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 7% |
| Unknown | 90 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,351,667
of 25,295,968 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#223
of 4,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,102
of 101,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#4
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,295,968 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.