↓ Skip to main content

Structural variability and niche differentiation in the rhizosphere and endosphere bacterial microbiome of field-grown poplar trees

Overview of attention for article published in Microbiome, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
408 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Structural variability and niche differentiation in the rhizosphere and endosphere bacterial microbiome of field-grown poplar trees
Published in
Microbiome, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40168-017-0241-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bram Beckers, Michiel Op De Beeck, Nele Weyens, Wout Boerjan, Jaco Vangronsveld

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 408 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 406 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 101 25%
Researcher 56 14%
Student > Master 46 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 6%
Student > Bachelor 23 6%
Other 48 12%
Unknown 108 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 156 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 55 13%
Environmental Science 38 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 1%
Other 26 6%
Unknown 120 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2017.
All research outputs
#2,884,161
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#1,120
of 1,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,022
of 328,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#34
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.