The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Incidence and Root Cause Analysis of Wrong-site Pain Management Procedures
|
---|---|
Published in |
Anesthesiology, March 2010
|
DOI | 10.1097/aln.0b013e3181cf892d |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Steven P. Cohen, Salim M. Hayek, Sukdeb Datta, Zahid H. Bajwa, Thomas M. Larkin, Scott Griffith, Greg Hobelmann, Paul J. Christo, Ronald White |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 400% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 350% |
Researcher | 6 | 300% |
Professor | 5 | 250% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 200% |
Other | 19 | 950% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 1600% |
Psychology | 3 | 150% |
Engineering | 3 | 150% |
Design | 2 | 100% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 100% |
Other | 4 | 200% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2024.
All research outputs
#4,632,633
of 26,563,746 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesiology
#1,682
of 6,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,519
of 106,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesiology
#3
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,563,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.