↓ Skip to main content

Prescription of prosthetic ankle-foot mechanisms after lower limb amputation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prescription of prosthetic ankle-foot mechanisms after lower limb amputation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003978.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheriel J Hofstad, Harmen van der Linde, Jacques van Limbeek, Klaas Postema

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 214 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 15%
Researcher 26 12%
Student > Bachelor 24 11%
Student > Postgraduate 15 7%
Other 36 17%
Unknown 36 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 26%
Engineering 42 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 52 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,521,897
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,002
of 12,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,071
of 134,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.