The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Derivation, external and clinical validation of a deep learning approach for detecting intracranial hypertension
|
---|---|
Published in |
npj Digital Medicine, September 2024
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41746-024-01227-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Faris Gulamali, Pushkala Jayaraman, Ashwin S. Sawant, Jacob Desman, Benjamin Fox, Annette Chang, Brian Y. Soong, Naveen Arivazagan, Alexandra S. Reynolds, Son Q. Duong, Akhil Vaid, Patricia Kovatch, Robert Freeman, Ira S. Hofer, Ankit Sakhuja, Neha S. Dangayach, David S. Reich, Alexander W. Charney, Girish N. Nadkarni |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Japan | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2024.
All research outputs
#916,740
of 26,187,546 outputs
Outputs from npj Digital Medicine
#291
of 1,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,519
of 168,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from npj Digital Medicine
#4
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,187,546 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.