The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Medicinal cannabis extracts are neuroprotective against Aβ1–42‐mediated toxicity in vitro
|
---|---|
Published in |
Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, September 2024
|
DOI | 10.1111/bcpt.14078 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dylan T. Marsh, Mayu Shibuta, Ryuji Kato, Scott D. Smid |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 14% |
Australia | 1 | 14% |
Italy | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2024.
All research outputs
#2,695,537
of 26,641,588 outputs
Outputs from Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology
#99
of 2,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,680
of 195,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,641,588 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them