The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Biomechanics and morphological comparisons of the caudal region of titanosaurs from the Cretaceous of Brazil: Paleobiology and paleoecology inferences
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Anatomy, September 2024
|
DOI | 10.1111/joa.14134 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Luciano S. Vidal, Lílian P. Bergqvist, Carlos R. A. Candeiro, Kamila L. N. Bandeira, Sandra Tavares, Theo B. Ribeiro, Paulo V. L. G. C. Pereira |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
Thailand | 2 | 4% |
Argentina | 2 | 4% |
Japan | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Taiwan | 1 | 2% |
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 36 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 46 | 82% |
Scientists | 10 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 50% |
Researcher | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 50% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2024.
All research outputs
#1,090,779
of 26,740,027 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anatomy
#146
of 2,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,800
of 214,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anatomy
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,740,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.