↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Evolutionary Biology, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
141 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
BMC Evolutionary Biology, January 2004
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-4-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philippe Menozzi, Ming Shi, Andrée Lougarre, Zhen Tang, Didier Fournier

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 6%
Egypt 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 91 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 26%
Researcher 25 25%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 9 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 13%
Chemistry 4 4%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Neuroscience 1 <1%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 12 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2017.
All research outputs
#7,762,613
of 12,373,386 outputs
Outputs from BMC Evolutionary Biology
#1,789
of 2,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,347
of 257,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Evolutionary Biology
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,373,386 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,341 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.