The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Measurement of engine exhaust plume temperature and concentration distributions with tomographic absorption spectroscopy and learning-based absorbance recovery
|
---|---|
Published in |
Fuel, December 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.fuel.2024.132775 |
Authors |
Ruifeng Wang, Pengfei Yu, Tianxu Huang, Yuan Cao, Jiaoxu Mei, Guishi Wang, Xiaoming Gao, Kun Liu |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 33% |
Student > Master | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 33% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2024.
All research outputs
#2,651,656
of 26,616,237 outputs
Outputs from Fuel
#89
of 3,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275
of 4,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fuel
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,616,237 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,828 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 4,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them