The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Longitudinal study of the manifestations and mechanisms of technology-related prescribing errors in pediatrics
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, September 2024
|
DOI | 10.1093/jamia/ocae218 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Magdalena Z Raban, Erin Fitzpatrick, Alison Merchant, Bayzidur Rahman, Tim Badgery-Parker, Ling Li, Melissa T Baysari, Peter Barclay, Michael Dickinson, Virginia Mumford, Johanna I Westbrook |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 40% |
Australia | 2 | 13% |
Spain | 1 | 7% |
Turkey | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 40% |
Scientists | 6 | 40% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2024.
All research outputs
#493,721
of 26,637,793 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
#82
of 3,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,711
of 181,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,637,793 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.