↓ Skip to main content

Risk Factors Associated With Suicide in Current and Former US Military Personnel

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
46 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
65 tweeters
facebook
16 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
277 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk Factors Associated With Suicide in Current and Former US Military Personnel
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, August 2013
DOI 10.1001/jama.2013.65164
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cynthia A. LeardMann, Teresa M. Powell, Tyler C. Smith, Michael R. Bell, Besa Smith, Edward J. Boyko, Tomoko I. Hooper, Gary D. Gackstetter, Mark Ghamsary, Charles W. Hoge

Abstract

Beginning in 2005, the incidence of suicide deaths in the US military began to sharply increase. Unique stressors, such as combat deployments, have been assumed to underlie the increasing incidence. Previous military suicide studies, however, have relied on case series and cross-sectional investigations and have not linked data during service with postservice periods.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 5%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 193 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 18%
Student > Master 32 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 15%
Researcher 31 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 6%
Other 45 22%
Unknown 19 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 72 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 51 25%
Social Sciences 24 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 31 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 479. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2019.
All research outputs
#24,777
of 15,793,690 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#682
of 28,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179
of 160,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#5
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,793,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.