You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of neuromuscular training (NEMEX-TJR) on patient-reported outcomes and physical function in severe primary hip or knee osteoarthritis: a controlled before-and-after study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-14-232 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eva Ageberg, Anna Nilsdotter, Eva Kosek, Ewa M Roos |
| Abstract |
The benefits of exercise in mild and moderate knee or hip osteoarthritis (OA) are apparent, but the evidence in severe OA is less clear. We recently reported that neuromuscular training was well tolerated and feasible in patients with severe primary hip or knee OA. The aims of this controlled before-and-after study were to compare baseline status to an age-matched population-based reference group and to examine the effects of neuromuscular training on patient-reported outcomes and physical function in patients with severe primary OA of the hip or knee. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 30% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 20% |
| Germany | 2 | 20% |
| France | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 250 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 48 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 10% |
| Researcher | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 43 | 17% |
| Unknown | 71 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 47 | 19% |
| Sports and Recreations | 24 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 6% |
| Unknown | 90 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2020.
All research outputs
#4,715,487
of 23,342,232 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#944
of 4,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,247
of 198,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#14
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.